Most programme update emails are written to demonstrate that the programme is being managed, not to inform the people receiving them. The distinction sounds subtle, but it produces very different documents. One is written for the sender. The other is written for the reader.
The end of a consulting engagement is the part that most clients remember longest, and the part that most consultants handle least carefully. A good close is not a formality. It is the step that determines whether the work that has been done over the preceding weeks or months actually continues once the consultant is no longer in the room.
Most change programmes begin with a plan. A timeline, a set of workstreams, a list of owners. What they rarely begin with is a clear picture of how those workstreams connect to each other, which means the plan is built on assumptions that nobody has tested. Dependency mapping is the step that tests those assumptions before they become problems.
A programme governance review sounds formal, and in some ways it is. It involves structured interviews, document analysis and a written findings report. But the purpose is practical: to give the programme sponsor a clear picture of whether the governance framework is fit for the work it is supposed to support.
The decision to bring in an interim Programme Director is not always straightforward. It involves admitting that the current arrangement is not working, which is a difficult conversation in most organisations. But there are situations where it is clearly the right call, and recognising them early makes a significant difference to the outcome.
A leadership offsite is one of the more expensive things a senior team can do with two days. The room, the travel, the preparation time and, most significantly, the opportunity cost of pulling a group of senior people out of their normal work. Getting that investment to produce something real requires deliberate design.
Most organisations going through a significant change programme have a stakeholder register. Fewer have a stakeholder engagement plan. The two are often treated as the same thing, which is a problem, because they answer different questions and require different kinds of thinking to produce.
Every thread connected, every outcome clear.. Write to us